Organon and Homoeopathic Philosophy in MD (Homoeopathy) — the principles, read against the history of thought
What the MD (Hom.) Organon and Philosophy speciality covers: fourteen foundation modules, a clinical bridge, and twenty-one Part II modules, per the NCH CBDC.
Vaibhav Kumar Rai · · 4 min read
Every BHMS student reads the Organon of Medicine across four years, aphorism by aphorism, as OM-I to OM-IV. The MD speciality in Organon of Medicine and Homoeopathic Philosophy starts where that reading ends. It asks where Hahnemann’s principles came from, how they stand beside the philosophy and science of other traditions, and how they are carried into clinical judgement. It is one of the seven Part II specialities of the NCH Competency Based Dynamic Curriculum for MD (Homoeopathy), in force from the 2024-25 batch; MGGAU examines it as “Homeopathic Philosophy & Organon of Medicine”.
The course runs three years under the 2024 Post-Graduate Regulations — Part I, about eighteen months, as a Junior Resident, and Part II as a Senior Resident. This orientation follows the modules of the speciality’s curriculum document.
**Part I, Paper 1 — Fundamentals of Homoeopathic Philosophy.** Fourteen modules, in an order that moves from history to the clinic.
– **History and influence.** The course opens with the history of medicine — the ancient era, the Dark Ages and the Renaissance — and the evolution and spread of homoeopathy. The second module is wide in reach: the influence of other philosophies on homoeopathy. It reads Aristotle, Socrates and Plato; Hippocrates, Kant and Paracelsus; Goethe and Francis Bacon on Hahnemann; Swedenborg on Kent; and the history of modern medicine.
– **The system itself.** Modules follow on the general interpretation of homoeopathic philosophy as resting on the law of nature, and of homoeopathy as both science and art; the necessity and origin of the Organon, the ground plan of its editions, and the role of logic in that plan; and the fundamental principles, correlated with modern epidemiological and biomolecular sciences.
– **Vital force.** A module on substantialism traces substantialism and vitalism historically, develops Hahnemann’s concept of vital force in their light, takes Kent’s concept of Simple Substance, and sets vitalism beside modern medicine and developmental biology.
– **Life, health, disease and cure.** Three modules take health as the balanced function of the vital energy and disease as a changed condition of life; cure and recovery; and the preservation of health, with the physician as its preserver. On prophylaxis, the curriculum’s own wording is an evaluation and critical study of the concept in relation to the principles of homoeopathic therapeutics.
– **Toward the clinic.** The remaining modules take the primary and secondary action of medicines beside modern pharmacology — the Arndt-Schulz law, the Koetschau effect and hormesis — then the classification of disease, the examination of the patient and case analysis, susceptibility and idiosyncrasy, and human drug proving: its necessity, method, sources, the ideal prover and the recording of symptoms.
**Part I, Paper 2 — the clinical bridge.** Five modules on the fundamentals of clinical medicine in relation to the Organon: evidence-based practice, a clinical approach built at the bedside, the cardinal manifestations of disease with the Hahnemannian and miasmatic classifications, nutrition, and the interpretation of investigations.
**Part I, Paper 3** is the Research Methodology and Biostatistics paper common to all seven specialities.
**Part II, Papers 1 and 2 — Homoeopathic Philosophy.** Twenty-one modules, which group naturally.
**Logic and method.** The logic of homoeopathy — formal, inductive and deductive, and the logic of Aristotle, Bacon, Mill and Hahnemann applied to homoeopathic practice. Later, a module on phenomenology and empiricism and their relationship with homoeopathy.
**Susceptibility, pathology and miasm.** Susceptibility, reaction and immunity; the relation of pathology to therapeutics, from prodromal and subclinical stages to fundamental, exciting and predisposing causes; and the general pathology of homoeopathy, which reads the concept of miasm in the light of modern pathology and microbiology.
**The patient and the symptom.** An interdisciplinary, patient-centred approach to examination; homoeopathic semiology, which compares the types of symptoms according to Hahnemann, Kent, Boenninghausen, Boger, Garth Boericke, Ortega, Paschero, M. L. Dhawale and others; and case perceiving in special settings, with the special directions of Hahnemann, Kent, Stuart Close, H. A. Roberts and Boenninghausen, and the one-sided, intermittent and alternating diseases.
**After the prescription.** The dynamic action of drugs; prognosis from the remedy reaction; the second prescription and the relationships of medicines; suppression and palliation; the alternation of remedies in Hahnemannian and post-Hahnemannian writing; H. A. Roberts’s concept of the deflected current and the obstacles it names; and homoeopathic posology and the principle of infinitesimals.
**Scope and limitation.** A module is given to the scope and limitations of homoeopathy — the sphere of similia, Dake’s exclusion method, and the limits of the system in different clinical settings. That the curriculum sets this down as a subject of study is worth noticing.
**Other topics.** Temperaments; the study of provings, Hahnemannian and modern; the modern schools of philosophy — Kant on causation, Jung’s archetypes and synchronicity, Hegel’s organic view, Leibniz and Bergson on energy, and Karl Popper’s critical rationalism; and, to close, the modern schools of homoeopathic philosophy, with the software and e-learning tools now used to study its principles.
**Who this speciality forms.** The curriculum describes a scholar who can place Hahnemann in the history of ideas, read his principles against logic, science and philosophy both old and new, and bring that reading to the bedside — to the evaluation of symptoms, the reading of a remedy’s action and the second prescription. Of the seven specialities, it is the one most directly concerned with the question of what homoeopathy holds and why.
**What this room will hold.** Study notes following the CBDC modules in order: the history and philosophical influences, the editions and ground plan of the Organon, vital force and substantialism, semiology across the masters, the second prescription and remedy reaction, and orientations to the modern philosophers the curriculum names. Everything here carries the MD tag and the Organon category, so it also stands on the Organon topic in Homoeopathy Knowledge.
Written by Vaibhav Kumar Rai · Published by Homoeopaths.org · 30 September 2026