Our Story — why Homoeopaths.org exists

This page carries the story of why Homoeopaths.org exists — in the founders’ own words, not a marketing account of it.

Homoeopaths.org began with two people, Vaibhav Rai and Rajat Singh, who kept running into the same gap from different sides of it. The homoeopathy community in India is not small. There are colleges, there are batches, there are registered practitioners, and there are people looking for a qualified homoeopath nearby. The parts exist. What did not exist was a connection between them. A first-year student had no reliable source for what was official in their own course. A practitioner had no listing they controlled. A care-seeker had no way to tell a qualified homoeopath from a claim.

Homoeopaths.org is built as a common ground for that community — organised by college and batch, verified where it matters, and honest about what it is and isn’t. It does not argue for homoeopathy as a system of medicine. It organises the people and the knowledge that already exist around it, so that being part of this field feels less scattered.

The platform started in Uttar Pradesh, with twelve colleges — nine government and three private — all affiliated to Mahayogi Guru Gorakhnath AYUSH University, Gorakhpur. It grows the way it started: depth first, one connected college at a time, rather than spreading thin across a wider map before the first network is solid.

Every part of this platform traces back to that founding gap: a student directory organised by college and batch instead of scattered forwards, a practitioner directory where a listing states a real qualification and registration number, and a care-seeker’s search that returns people who can be checked, not just claimed. As more of the platform’s rooms and shelves fill in, this page will keep telling that story plainly, without dressing it up.

The choice to start narrow, in one state, with a fixed and named list of colleges, was as deliberate as the choice to build the platform at all. A community platform that tried to cover every college in India from day one would have had to guess at most of what it claimed; a platform that named its twelve colleges, verified its practitioners against real registration numbers, and organised its students by real batches could only do that by staying close enough to the ground to check its own facts. Depth first was the only way to keep the platform’s own promise — verification over persuasion — true from the very first college onward.

If you want to read the fuller picture of what the platform holds today, or who is building it, both of those live nearby: what runs on the platform now, and who is behind it.